J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2017;6:7-10.
https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh20176710
Effect of Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lenses on Stability of Cellular and Intracellular Membranes in Corneal Epithelium
T.A. Veliksar; N.F. Leus, Dr. Sc. (Med.), Prof.; T.B. Gaydamaka, Dr. Sc. (Med.); I.N. Mikheitseva, Dr. Sc. (Biol.); G.I. Drozhzhyna, Dr. Sc. (Med.), Prof.; S.G. Kolomiichuk, a Research Fellow
Filatov Institute of Eye Disease and Tissue Therapy
Odessa, Ukraine
E-mail: tveliksar@gmail.com
Introduction. Contact lenses are increasingly used worldwide for correcting refraction disorders. However, contact lenses can destroy a biochemical composition of the tear.
Purpose. To determine the effect of silicone hydrogel contact lenses on the stability of cell membranes and membranes of subcellular structures in the corneal epithelium through detecting marker enzymes in the tear fluid.
Material and Methods. We determined the activity of lactate dehydrogenase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, and acid phosphatase in tears of patients divided into two groups. Study group comprised 13 people (24 eyes): moderate myopia patients continuously wearing soft contact lenses. Control group consisted of 20 people (40 eyes): moderate myopia patients, spectacles wearers.
Results. We revealed a significant increase in the activity of lactate dehydrogenase and glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase by >35% and 24%, respectively, as well as a significant increase in the activity of acid phosphatase by 22.4% in the Study group patients comparing to controls.
Conclusions. Continuous soft contact lens wearing increases the lability of the corneal epithelium cell membranes. We believe that pharmacological correction of such pathologic changes can prevent the development of severe complications associated with contact lens vision correction.
Keywords: cornea, contact lens, lactate dehydrogenase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, acid phosphatase
Reference
- Nasledov A. [SPSS computer analysis of data in psychology and social studies]. St.-Petersburg: Piter Publ. 2005:416. Russian.
- [New methods of biochemical analysis]. Izd. Leningradskogo universiteta; 1991. 395 p. Russian.
- Petrovich YuA. [Biochemistry of the tear ant its changes in pathology]. Voprosy med. khimii. 1990;36(13):13-8. Russian.
- Choy CK, Cho P, Benzie IF, Ng V. Effect of one overnight wear of orthokeratology lenses on tear composition. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2004;81(6):414-20.
Crossref Pubmed - Dart JK, Radford CF, Minassian D, Verma S, Stapleton F. Risk factors for microbial keratitis with contemporary contact lenses: a case-control study. Ophthalmology. 2008;115(10):1647-54. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.05.003
Crossref Pubmed - Diec J, Tilia D, Thomas V. Comparison of Silicone Hydrogel and Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lenses. Eye Contact Lens. 2017; Jan 17. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000363.
Crossref Pubmed - Ichijima H, Ohashi J, Cavanagh HD. Effect of contact-lens-induced hypoxia on lactate dehydrogenase activity and isozyme in rabbit cornea. Cornea. 1992;11(2):108-13.
Crossref Pubmed - Iskeleli G, Karakoc Y, Akdeniz-Kayhan B. Comparison of tear lactate dehydrogenase activities of different types of contact lens wearers and normal control group. CLAO J. 1999;25(2):101-4.
- Joseph TB. Contact Lens Spectrum's annual report of major corporate and product developments and events in the contact lens industry in 2004, as well as predictions for 2005. Cont. Lens Spectr. 2005;1:26–31.
- Morgan PB, Woods CA, Tranoudis IG et al. International contact lens prescribing in 2011. Cont.Lens Spectr. 2012;10:26–31.
- Willcox MD. Is There a Role for Inflammation in Contact Lens Discomfort? Eye Contact Lens. 2017;43(1):5-16. doi: 10.1097 / ICL.0000000000000343.
Crossref Pubmed - Zhang H, Zhao F, Hutchinson DS, et al. Conjunctival Microbiome Changes Associated With Soft Contact Lens and Orthokeratology Lens Wearing. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis Sci. 2017;58(1):128-36. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20231.
Crossref Pubmed - Ziadi M, Moiroux P, d'Athis P et al. Assessment of induced corneal hypoxia in diabetic patients. Cornea. 2002;21(5):453-7.
Crossref Pubmed