J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2018;1:26-30.

https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201812630


Howell Modified Test for qualitative and quantitative assessment of near phoria

A.V. Kriuchko, ophthalmologist

Optic Rehabilitation Center OKTAR;

Poltava (Ukraine)

E-mail: lkkz@ukr.net            

TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Kriuchko AV. Howell Modified Test for qualitative and quantitative assessment of near phoria. J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2018;1:26-30. https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh201812630


Introduction. During a routine optometric examination, much attention is paid to a state of accommodation, convergence, and their interaction.

Purpose. To improve the Howell test for near phoria with the possibility of qualitative and quantitative assessment of ocular muscle balance for near.

Materials and Methods. During a routine optometric examination, 78 patients with mild and moderate myopia were examined for near phoria using the Modified Howell Test (MHT) and the dissociated test with prisms as a control.

Results. Mean near heterophoria values were 1.37 ± 0.48 prism diopters by the MHT and 1.39 ± 0.48 prism diopters by the control test with prisms, the difference was insignificant (p<0.05). Normal values of near phoria with complete correction were found in 24.4% of cases. Acceptable values of shifts on either side were found in 30.7% of cases. Exophoria was in 2.6%. Esophoria was found in 42.3% of cases. The absence of differences in examination using the HMT and the control test with prisms was found in 39.8% of cases, taking into account standard deviation of ±1 prism diopters in 68% of cases. Deviation of ±2 prism diopters was found in 23.1%; ±3 and above prism diopters in 8.9%. The means of differences between the tests was 1.03±0.12 prism diopters.

Conclusions. The Modified Howell Test can be used for qualitative and quantitative measurements of near phoria during the optometric examination. The phoria tests for near phoria consistently characterize a state of muscular balance of eyes.

Key-words: binocular vision, phoria, phoria tests, Howell test 


References

  1. Gifford K. [How to start to control myopia in the practice?] Vestnik optometrii. 2016;6:44. Russian.
  2. Lapach SN, Chubenko AV, Babich PN. [Statistical methods in medical and biological studies using Exel]. Kiev:Morion; 2000. 317p. Russian.
  3. Kuznetsov YuV. [Appointment of the distance between the optical centers of lenses in glasses]. Saint-Petersburg:RA”Veko”;2009. 102p. Russian. 
  4. Miagkov AV, Parfenova NP, Demina EI. [ Guidance for medical optics]. M.:Aprel;2016. 205p. Russian.
  5. Rozhkova GI, Matveev SG. [Vision in children. Problems of assessment and functional correction]. M.:Nauka;2007. 315p. Russian.
  6. Elkington AR, Frank HJ, Greaney MJ. [Clinical optics for ophthalmologist and optometrist]. Saint Petersburg:RA”Veko”;2014. 264p. Russian. 
  7. Goss DA, Reynolds JL, Todd RE. Comparison of four dissociated phoria tests: Reliability and correlation with symptom survey score.J Behav Optom. 2010;4:99-104.
  8. Maples WC, Savoy RS, Harville BJ, Golden LR, Hoenes Р. Comparison of far and near arrest two clinical methods. OVD; 2009:40(2):100-6.
  9. Normal values of the accommodation and vergence at all ages. Jama; 59(12):1010-3.