https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh20142112117

Some problems and prospects of aphakia intraocular correction in cataract phacoemulsification

D. G.Zhaboedov

National Medical University named after AA Bogomolets, Kiev (Ukraine)

Key words: cataract, intraocular correction, problems and prospects, principles of bionics.

The analysis of scientific literature on intraocular correction of aphakia has been carried out. There were marked the progress, achievements and failures of researchers at all stages of cataract surgery, which along with the introduction of new operation methods carried out the search and development of new models of intraocular lens, the main criteria of which had been designated by S. N. Fedorov. The important properties of the IOL are considered to be ideal biocompatibility, biostability, perfect transparency, defined borders of refractive index, lightness in the aqueous humor, elasticity with shape memory without generating optical aberrations, providing contrast quality, preservation of color vision, good vision of object details at different distances and under different illuminance along with high visual acuity that approaches IOL to the natural lens of the healthy eye. There were examined the main types of IOL models implanting at present, their advantages and disadvantages, properties and design features among which there are IOLs with accommodative effect, toric, multifocal and aspheric IOLs, lenses with coated optics and chromatic component, simple and stable fixation in the posterior chamber in place of natural lens. Thus, these areas are based on the principles of bionics, so borrowing in nature the ways to improve the methods of intraocular correction look promising on the grounds that the evolutionary nature has eternity and researches are strictly limited in time.

References

1.Abbasova UA. Innovations in phacoemulsification technology. (Literature review). Oftalmologiya. 2010;4:81-6. Russian.

2.Balashevich LI, Stakheev AA, Khakimov AM. Functional and optic results of spherical and aspherical lenses implantation into the capsule bag. Oftalmokhirurgiia. 2009;5:29-33. Russian.

3.Bachuk NYu. Experience of toric intraocular lens implantation in patients with cataract with corneal astigmatism. Mezhdunarodnyi meditsinskii zhurnal. 2013;19(1):63-6. Russian.

4.Demianchenko SK. Clinical and theoretical rationale for the method of intraocular correction of aphakia by aspherical IOL: thesis for Candidate of Med. Science:14.01.07. MNTK Eye Microsurgery n.a.acad. S. N. Fyodorov. M.; 2011. 83 p.

5.Zagrebelnaia LV. Clinical and functional assessment of the effectiveness of using multiphocal and accommodating intraocular lenses in aphakia correction: author's thesis for Candidate of Med. Science: 14.01.07. FGOU DPO IPK FMBA Russia. M.; 2012. 23 p.

6.Ivonin KS, Zamyrov AA, Kudryavtseva YuV, Chuprov AD. Recovery of accommodative capacity of pseudophakic eye. Sovremennyie teknologii v meditsine. 2012;4:154- 160. Russian.

7.Malyugin BE, Rereshchenko AV, Belyi YuA et al. Modern standards of cataract surgery with IOL implantation (Literature review). Refraktsionnaia khirirgiia I oftalmologiia. 2010;10(3):4-10. Russian.

8.Malyugin BE, Isayev MA, Golovin AV. Comparative characteristics of visual functions and aberrometry data in pa¬tients with spherical, aspherical and accommodating models of IOL. Oftalmokhirutgiia/ 2012;2:36-7. Russian.

9.Popova EA, Kovalenko YuV. Phacoemulsification of cataract with toric IOL implantation is an effective way of intraocular correction of astigmatism. Oftalmol Zh. 2012;4:98-9. Russian.
Crossref

10.Rykov SO, Vasyta VA. The incidence of eye diseases and its adnexa, their prevalence in the population of Ukraine. Ukraina. Zdorovie natsii. 2011;4:7-11. Ukrainian.

11.Sergiienko NM. Modern ophthalmology and current opportunities for diagnosis and treatment of ocular pathology: jubilee scientific practical conference with international participation (20-21 November 2013): collection of papers. K.; 2013:330-2.

12.Takhtaiev YuV. Experience of clinical application of multiphocal intraocular lens Acrysof Restor. VIII Congress of Ophthalmologists of Russia: theses. M.: MNTK Eye Mi-crosurgery, 2005: 620.

13.Cherednik VI, Treushnikov VM. Spherical aberration and aspherical intraocular lenses. Fundamentalnyie issledova-niia. 2007;8:38-41. Russian.

14.Cherednik VI, Treushnikov VM. Multifocal intraocular lenses — quality of vision. Fundamentalnyie issledovaniia. 2008;4:108-11. Russian.

15.Feduashev GA, Vlasov AV. Clinical and economic effective¬ness of implantation of toric and spherical IOL Rayner af¬ter phacoemulcification of cataract in patients with initial corneal astigmatism. Fyodorov's Memorial Lectures-2013. 21-22 June 2013. Moscow; 2013: 229- 30.

16.Berthet JM, Camming JS, Kammann J. The concepts be-hind the IOLs of the 21st century. Ophthalmos. 1997;8:6-9.

17.Cillino S, Casuccio A, Pace FA et al. ONE-Year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses. Oph¬thalmology. 2008;115(9):1508-16.
Crossref

18.Dekaris I, Gabric N, Bosnar D et al. Diffractive and multi-focal IOLs in cataract surgery. Joint congress of SOE/AAO (9-12 June 2007). Vienna, 2007:5- 6.

19.Levin LA, Nilsson SFE, Ver Hoeve J, Wu SM etc. Adler's physiology of the eye. 11m ed. Elsevier Inc; 2013. 795 p.

20.Mayank A, Nanavaty D, Spalton J et al. Wavefront aberra¬tions, depth of focus, and contrast sensitivity with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: fellow-eye study.. Cata¬ract Refract. Surg. 2009;35:663-71.
Crossref   Pubmed

21.Mesci C, Erbil HH, Olgun A, Aydin N et al. Differences in contrast sensitivity between monofocal, multifocal and accommodating intraocular lenses: long-term results. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010;38 (8);768-77.
Crossref

22.Pagnoulle C, Bozukova D, Gobin L et al. Assessment ofnew-generation glistering-free hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens material. J Ctaract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1271-7.
Crossref