J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2020;2:24-29.
http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202022429
Received: 18 February 2020; Published on-line: 30 April 2020
Structural corneal changes identified with the use of confocal microscopy after accelerated CXL for keratoconus
L.F. Troichenko1, Cand Sc (Med); K.V. Sereda1, Cand Sc (Med); G.I. Drozhzhyna1, Dr Sc (Med); O.M. Ivanova1, Cand Sc (Med); N.V. Medvedovska2, Dr Sc (Med), Prof.
1 Filatov Institute of Eye Diseases and Tissue Therapy, NAMS of Ukraine; Odesa (Ukraine)
2 P.L. Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education; Kyiv (Ukraine)
E-mail: cornea@te.net.ua
TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Troichenko LF, Sereda KV, Drozhzhyna GI, Ivanova OM, Medvedovska NV. Structural corneal changes identified with the use of confocal microscopy after accelerated CXL for keratoconus. J.ophthalmol.(Ukraine).2020;2:24-29. http://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh202022429
Background: Post-crosslinking (CXL) biomicroscopic changes in patients with keratoconus can be detected by confocal microscopy. Few studies reported on morphological changes in the cornea after CXL.
Purpose: To detect structural corneal changes by confocal microscopy after accelerated CXL for keratoconus.
Material and Methods: This study included 119 patients (167 eyes) who underwent accelerated CXL for keratoconus and were followed up for 12 months. Accelerated CXL was carried out using the UV-X™ 2000 Crosslinking System at an irradiation intensity of 9 mW/ cm?. Confocal biomicroscopy was performed using the Confoscan 4 unit (NIDEK Co., Ltd., Aichi, Japan).
Results: Accelerated CXL (carried out in 10 minutes) for stage 2 to 3 progressive keratoconus is safe and allows stabilizing the pathological process, based on the 12-month follow-up results. At 3 months after accelerated CXL, active regeneration of keratocytes was seen in the superficial and deep stroma, with resolution of fibrotic foci. Confocal microscopy found that recovery of normal corneal architectonics started at 6 months and keratocyte repopulation was complete at 12 months after CXL.
Keywords: keratoconus, corneal collagen, accelerated cross-linking
References
1.Bikbov MM, Surkova VK. [Corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus]. A review. Ophthalmology in Russia. 2014;11(3):13-8. Russian.
2.Birich TA, Chekina AIu, Aksionova NI. [Outcomes of treatment for keratoconus]. Oftalmologiia Belorusi. 2010;1(4):90-7. Russian.
3.Ivanovskaia EV, Vit VV, Golovchenko VG. [Immunological status of patients with various stages of keratoconus and keratoglobus]. Oftalmol Zh. 2000;5:40-4. Russian.
4.Sevastiianov EN, Gorskova EN, Ekgard VF. [Keratoconus (etiology, pathogenesis, medicinal treatment): textbook]. Cheliabinsk: UGMADO;2005. Russian.
5.Solodkova EG, Remesnikov IA. [Modern approaches in the treatment progressive keratectasia]. Prakticheskaia meditsina. 2012;4:75-9. Russian.
6.Adel Alhayek, Pei-Rong Lu. Corneal collagen crosslinking in keratoconus and other eye disease. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015; 8(2): 407–18. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.02.35.
7.Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Schilde T, et al. Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross-links in corneas treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Feb;32(2):279-83.
8.Nowak DM, Gajecka M. The genetics of keratoconus. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;18(1):2-6.
9.Spoerl E, Mrochen M, Sliney D, et al. Safety of UVA – riboflavin cross – linking of the cornea. Cornea. 2007 May;26(4):385-9.
10.Sporl E, Huhle M, Kasper M, Seiler T. [Increased rigidity of the cornea caused by intrastromal crosslinking]. Ophthalmologe. 1997 Dec;94(12):902-6. German.
11.Vinciguerra P, Torres I, Camesasca FI. Applications of confocal microscopy in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2002 May-Jun;18(3 Suppl):S378-81.
12.Cavanagh HD, Petroll WM, Alizadeh H, et al. Clinical and diagnostic use of in vivo confocal microscopy in patients with corneal disease. Ophthalmology. 1993 Oct;100(10):1444-54.
13.Somodi S, Hahnel C, Slowik C, et al. Confocal in vivo microscopy and confocal laser-scanning fluorescence microscopy in keratoconus. Ger J Ophthalmol. 1996 Nov;5(6):518-25.
14.Tsubota K, Mashima Y, Murata H, et al. Corneal epithelium in keratoconus. Cornea. 1995 Jan;14(1):77-83.
15.Vinciguerra P, Alb? E, Trazza S, Rosetta P, Vinciguerra R, Seiler T, et al. Refractive, topographic, tomographic, and aberrometric analysis of keratoconic eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. Ophthalmology. 2009 Mar;116(3):369-78.
16.Patel SV, McLaren JW, Hodge DO, et al. Normal human keratocyte density and corneal thickness measurement by using confocal microscopy in vivo. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci. 2001 Feb;42(2):333-9.
17.Chew SJ, Beuerman RW, Assouline M, et al. Early diagnosis of infectious keratitis with in vivo real time confocal microscopy. CLAO J. 1992 Jul;18(3):197-201.
18.Chiou AG, Beuerman RW, Kaufman SC, Kaufman HE. Confocal microscopy in lattice corneal dystrophy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophtalmol. 1999 Aug;237(8):697-701.
19.Chiou AG, Kaufman SC, Beuerman RW, et al. Confocal microscopy in posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy. Ophthalmologica. 1999;213(4):211-3.
20.Ciancaglini M, Carpineto P, Doronzo E, et al. Morphological evaluation of Schnyder's central crystalline dystrophy by confocal microscopy before and after phototherapeutic keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Apr;37(3):308-12.
21.Croghale NS. Epidemiology of keratoconus. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8): 382-3.
22.Ku JY, Grupcheva CN, McGhee CN. Microstructural analysis of Salzmann's nodular degeneration by in vivo confocal microscopy. Clin Exp Ophtalmol. 2002 Oct;30(5):367-8.
23.Kymionis GD, Portaliou DM, Bouzoukis DI, et al. Herpetic keratitis with iritis after corneal crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A for keratoconus. J Cataract and Refract Surg. 2007 Nov;33(11):1982-4.
24.Rosenberg ME, Tervo TM, Muller LJ, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy after herpes keratitis. Cornea. 2002 Apr;21(3):265-9.
25.Rosenberg ME, Tervo TM, Immonen IJ, et al. Corneal structure and sensitivity in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. – 2000;41:2915–21.
26.Rothstein A, Auran J, Wittpenn J. et al. Confocal microscopy in Meretoja syndrome. Cornea. 2002 May;21(4):364-7.
27.Spoerl E, Huhle M, Seiler T. Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue. Exp Eye Res. 1998 Jan;66(1):97-103.
28.Spoerl E, Seiler T J. Techniques for stiffening the cornea. Refract Surg. 999 Nov-Dec;15(6):711-3.
29.Brookes NH, Loh IP, Clover GM, et al. Involvement of corneal nerves in the progression of keratoconus. Exper Eye Res. 2003;77:515–24.
30.Hollingsworth JG, Efron N, Tullo AB. In vivo corneal confocal microscopy in keratoconus. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 May;25(3):254-60.
31.Simo Mannion L, Tromans C, O’Donnell C. An evaluation of corneal nerve morphology and function in moderate keratoconus. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2005 Dec;28(4):185-92. Epub 2005 Nov 21.
32.Patel DV, McGhee CN. Mapping the corneal sub-basal nerve plexus in keratoconus by in vivo laser scanning confocal microscopy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:1348–51.
33.Rabinowitz YS. Keratoconus. Surv Ophthalmol. 1998 Jan-Feb;42(4):297-319.
34.McQuaid R, Cummings AB, Mrochen M. The theory and art of corneal cross-linking. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2013 Aug;61(8):416-9.
35.Avetisov SE, Egorov EA, Moshetova LK, et al. [Ophthalmology: National Guidance]. GEOTAR-Media: Moscow; 2018. Russian.
36.Mazzotta C, Traversi C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi O, Bovone C, Sparano MC, et al. Corneal healing after riboflavin ultraviolet-A collagen cross-linking determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy in vivo: Early and late modifications. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Oct;146(4):527-533.
37.Mazzotta C, Hafezi F, Kymionis G, et al. In Vivo Confocal Microscopy after Corneal Collagen Crosslinking. Ocul Surf. 2015 Oct;13(4):298-314.
38.Touboul D, Efron N, Smadja D, et al. Corneal confocal microscopy following conventional, transepithelial, and accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking procedures for keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2012 Nov;28(11):769-76.
39.Zare MA, Mazloumi M, Farajipour H, et al. Effects of corneal collagen crosslinking on confocal microscopic findings and tear indices in patients with progressive keratoconus. Int J Prev Med. 2016 Dec; 23(7): 132.
40.Wasilewski D, Mello GH, Moreira H. Impact of collagen crosslinking on corneal sensitivity in keratoconus patients. Cornea. 2013 Jul;32(7):899-902.
41.Knappe S, Stachs O, Zhivov A, et al. Results of confocal microscopy examinations after collagen cross-linking with riboflavin and UVA light in patients with progressive keratoconus. Ophthalmologica. 2011;225(2):95-104.
42.Macsai MS, Varley GA, Krachmer JH. Development of keratoconus after contact lens wear. Patient characteristics. Arch Ophthalmol. 1990 Apr;108(4):534-8.
43.Mazzotta C, Balestrazzi A, Traversi C, et al. Treatment of progressive keratoconus by riboflavin-UVA-induced cross-linking of corneal collagen; ultrastructural analysis by Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph II in vivo confocal microscopy in humans. Cornea. 2007 May;26(4):390-7.
44.Meek KM, Tuft SJ, Huang Y, et al. Changes in collagen orientation and distribution in keratoconus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005. 2005 Jun;46(6):1948-56.
45.Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. – 2003 May;135(5):620-7.
46.Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T.. Stress-strain measurements of human and porcine corneas after riboflavinultraviolet – A-induced cross-linking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Sep;29(9):1780-5.
47.Werner LP, Issid K, WernerL, et al. Salzmann's corneal degeneration associated with epithelial basement membrane dystrophy. Cornea. 2000 Jan;19(1):121-3.
48.Winchester K, Mathers WD, Sutphin JE, et al. Diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis in vivo with confocal microscopy. Cornea. 1995 Jan;14(1):10-7.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.