https://doi.org/10.31288/oftalmolzh2015536

Importance of clinical and cytological factors for prediction of efficacy of treatment in persistent corneal epithelial defects and ulcers from different causes

L.F. Troichenko1, Cand. Sc. (Med), G.I. Drozhzhina1, Dr. Sc. (Med), Prof.,  V.V. Vit1, Dr. Sc. (Med), Prof., V.V. Filonenko2, Dr. Sc. (Biol), Prof., A.I. Khoruzhenko2, Cand. Sc. (Biol), Sen. Res.

1 Filatov Eye Disease and Tissue Therapy Institute, the NAMS of Ukraine, Odessa

2 Institute of Molecular Biology and Genetics National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

E-mail: lf2008@ukr.net

Background: Characteristics of persistent corneal epithelial defects (PCEDs) of neurotrophic origin are a long clinical course and abnormal epithelial regeneration; additionally, patients often have complications such as stromal thinning and corneal perforation.

Purpose: To investigate the clinical and cytological factors influencing the efficacy of treatment of PCEDs.

Materials and Methods: The clinical and cytological factors for prediction of efficacy of treatment in PCEDs of different causes were investigated in 51 patients. We performed general ophthalmological examinations and cytological and immunohistochemical analysis using Millicell filters and antibodies against cytokeratins (CK), “corneal” CK3 and “conjunctival” CK19.

Results: The following factors were found to be of significant influence on the achievement of the outcome target (complete re-epithelialization of the corneal surface): size of corneal defect; flat margins of corneal defect; presence of basal cells in cytograms; absence of the cells expressing “corneal” CK3 and presence of the cells expressing “conjunctival” CK19 in immunohistochemistry. Univariant logistic regression was used for the quantitative assessment of the risk of failure to achieve complete re-epithelialization of corneal defects.

Conclusion: Using the mathematical model proposed, one can predict the achievement of complete re-epithelialization of the corneal surface with the conservative therapy in 74.5% of the cases with the sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 78.8%.

Keywords: persistent corneal epithelial defects, efficacy of treatment, prediction, clinical and cytological factors

References

1. Bonini S, Rama P, Olzi D, Lambiase A. Neurotrophic keratitis. Eye (Lond). 2003 Nov;17(8):989-95.
Crossref

2. Goins KM. New Insights into the Diagnosis and Treatment of Neurotrophic Keratopathy. Ocul Surf. 2005; Apr. 3(2):96-110.
Crossref

3. Madhusudan, GR, Sharma, RK, Nanda, V. Neuroparalytic keratitis: A rare manifestation of posttraumatic superior orbital fissure syndrome. Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Jul;53(1):83-5.
Crossref

4. Tuominen IS Konttinen YT Vesaluoma MH. Corneal innervation and morphology in primary Sjogren’s syndrome.  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:2545–2549.
Crossref

5. Barbaro V, Ferrari S, Fasolo A. Evaluation of ocular surface disorders: a new diagnostic tool based on impression cytology and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:926-32.
Crossref

6. Yamada N, Matsuda R, Morishige N. Open clinical study of eye – drops containing tetrapeptides derived from substance P and insulin-like growth factor-1 for treatment of persistent corneal epithelial defects associated with neurotrophic keratopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92:896-900.

7. Rao K, Leveque C, Pflugfelder SC. Corneal nerve regeneration in neurotrophic keratopathy following autologous plasma treatment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94:584-91.

8. Sacchetti M, Lambiase A. Diagnosis and management of neurotrophic keratitis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;8:571-9. 

9. Cavanagh HD, Colley AM. The molecular basis of neurotrophic keratitis. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 1989; 192: 115–134. 

10. Donisi PM, Rama P, Fasolo A, Ponzin D. Analysis of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency by Corneal Impression Cytology. Cornea. 2003;22(6):533-8.

11. Vit VV, Drozhzhina GI, Troichenko LF, Filonenko VV, Khoruzhenko AI, Cherednik OV.  [Importance of corneal epithelial to corneal conjunctival cell ratio in persistent corneal epithelial defects and ulcers of postinfectious and neuroparalytic etiology]. Oftalmol Zh. 2012;(4):7-12. Russian.